QUOTE (grey shark @ Mar 26 2008, 01:15 PM)

IF you took this out i reckon it's a near certainty that in 12 months time when the bonus is finished you would be dropped to a poor rate
I don't think one needs to be all that perceptive to know it's highly likely this is what will happen. I wouldn't imagine Barclays (or any other bank that plays the same game, of which -- I imagine -- there are many) are even trying to pretend otherwise.
It's a bonus rate of interest. You know it. They know it. They know you know it... etc.
QUOTE (grey shark @ Mar 26 2008, 01:15 PM)

, you would then have to go through the hassle of transfering it to another provider because of the NEW poor rate , if that be the case then you would of put £3,600 in there for a year to earn about a tenner extra .
Is it worth it ........NO .
The goal should surely be to always try to have your cash (whether it be ISA or regular taxed accounts) earning as high an interest rate as possible, no? There may be an argument for avoiding 'risky' banks in order to pursue, say, an extra half a percent here or there, but I suspect most people wouldn't consider Barclays to be an especially risky bank.
Assuming that seeking out the extra half a percent here and there is a way of life (e.g. let's say one might intend to find the best interest rates for the next 20 years or more), then to dismiss it as being a waste of time (presumably on the basis that half a percent of £3k is only £15) is to ignore the effects of (potentially) a lifetime's worth of compounding on all these extra half percents, for example:
£3k @ 6.0% for 20 years is £9621.
£3k @ 6.5% for 20 years is £10571.
Personally, given that my intention is to keep an eye on financial products anyway (unless, of course, I become simply too wealthy to care!

), then it would seem wasteful NOT to be prepared to move money around to take advantage of the best offers out there -- now and in the future.