QUOTE (The Ayatollah Bugheri @ Mar 3 2008, 11:50 AM)

The more I hear about the AST system the more defective it appears to be. On the one hand it offers no protection for long-term tenants from being kicked out of their home and forced to move every year (with all the trouble and expense this involves), yet on the other it offers no way of dealing with someone who behaves disruptively and destructively during the course of their tenancy. In most of the European countries which have tenancy protection legislation for people who rent long-term, the sort of behaviour described in post #4 (i.e. repeatedly disturbing the peace of other tenants and neighbours) is one of the few grounds on which a tenant can be evicted.
Dont get me wrong, there is a possesion procedure that the landlord can follow during the fixed term, but it would involve going to court (time and money) and the grounds for possesion would only be discretionary i.e. the court may not evict the tenant. The best route in this case would be to wait until the six months is up and get her out then.
Again as anyone simply said "look its not working out do you mind leaving?!"
Dont mix up the housing acts that deal with secutiry of tenure and those that deal with Tennancy Deposit Scheme, they are completley different things. Reading Ayatollahs post above, TDS in other countries is obviously completley different than it is in ours. TDS in this country simply ensures that the landlord/agent has protected the deposit, full stop.