QUOTE (talksalot81 @ Jan 8 2008, 10:49 AM)

Yes, but at the same time one cant feel entirely sorry when a bit of common sense really should have prevailled. She is meant to be one of the smarter ones amongst us...
Well, that is true.
QUOTE (Lagansider @ Jan 8 2008, 12:46 PM)

RE the doctor being in negative equity, it depends what her LTV was when she purchased, not just that the value of the Apt has fallen since the purchase price. If her LTV was 90%, or 95% then yes, as the value of the Apt has probably fallen by more than 10% so is less than the loan outstanding she is in negative equity. However,she had a sizeable deposit and the LTV is 60% or 70% then although the value of the Apt has fallen, then she will not actually be in negative equity unless the Apt value falls by over 30% or 40% to become less than the debt secured on it. Could be on the cards though.. I hope she didnt get a 100% (or more) mortgage, nursing (excuse pun) big loss esp if she did buy at top of market....
negative equity - the indebtedness that is produced when the market value of a property falls below the amount of the mortgage secured upon it.
OK, good point. But it doesn't matter - if the apt has fallen in value then she's lost either her own hard-earned deposit dosh or is in NE. TBH, if she'd had a sizeable deposit she maybe would (and should) have gone for a house instead.
Oh, and if prices plummet, those with 100% loans are ironically more free to walk away and emigrate to get away from the mess. Those with 20% or more capital tied up are more likely to try to work through it, and probably end up thousands worse off in the short-medium term (i.e. at least a decade) while their less responsible counterparts escape scot free!!
And remember, banks writing down loans is highly deflationary!