This was Wednesday's front page story on the Evening News:
How Norwich is heading flat out for troubleThursdays property section was a "bumper" 60 pages (it is usually 48 or 52 pages), including the usual "News" from TOPS chap - as SamandDave mentioned
here. Although I have to say, it bears a striking resemblance to what they wrote this time last year (all about making the house look welcoming, etc in the depths of winter). The property section also included the Abbots January sale, and one house proudly bearing "under stamp duty!" on a house priced at 234K...
Last year I started a spread sheet with houses that I liked the look of, that I'd consider if they weren't so dear, with the intention of keeping a track of them, and see how long it took for them to sell - it was a nightmare, as I found it difficult to keep track of the houses (listed with different agents, taken off rightmove, on with a different website, etc) so found it a difficult exercise to carry out (but I thought it would give me an idea of what was happening in the section of the housing market I was interested in - it's all
very sad muppet I know, but...) so instead, this year I have a (simpler) new plan! I've gone through and tallied up some results from the property section. I figure I can do this once a month ish, and it not take up too much of my time, and give me an overall view. I've gone for Total Number of properties, Less than 120K, 120K -250K, New on, No chain, New Price, Surprisingly reavailable

, POA

.
This weeks results...
Total properties: 850
Less than 120K: 48 (this includes that person's back garden for sale)
120-250K: 602
New on: 180
No chain: 116
New Price: 35
Surprisingly reavailable: 5
POA: 3
I've considered moving up the 120K to 130K, as there are quite a few just over the 120K price; the POAs in this week weren't grand affairs that only the supremely (over) loaded could afford, more on the market at probably 180ish, I was also surprised at how many are chain free - and not all flats, etc as you'd expect if it was BTLers selling up (although I spotted a few brand new flats for sale at below what you would expect - which, I guess could be BTL giving up as they can't find anyone to move in) 26 of the no chain properties were with TOPS - do they take distressed sales, and if they can't sell them, then auction them?
If things are going tits up, then I'd see an increase in no chains, and surprisingly reavailables, if things are peachy, then there shouldn't be any need for too many new price markers, as they'll be selling like hot cakes? Have I missed anything?
As for the N&N - sorry to hear that it was pants - you hear lots of things, but you never know how disastrous it all is until you go - I had a trip there 18 months ago, and was incredibly lucky as I landed a side room - so shared scubby loos etc weren't an issue. However the food was pants, and they couldn't/wouldn't even stretch to a cup of tea for Mr W&S - he stayed with me the whole time (slept in armchair for 2 nights) and did
everything for me - saving a
lot of time and effort on nurses/HCAs parts. It was only a few weeks after leaving that I realised although I'd had the bins emptied every day, I hadn't actually seen a cleaner in the room... I knew they'd closed wards (some for "redecoration", some as they supposedly didn't need the beds) but didn't realise they still put people in there - did any staff come and look in on you? AS for the NHS budgets, etc, don't get me started on the local PCT - grrrr!
And those Chapelfield flats? I'm not tempted - currently in a 3 bed detached with a garage and driveway in a nice area for about the same as your suggested offer to them - and far enough away from The Waffle House for it not to be a financial burden!
Waiting and saving seems more and more wise with every rate rise - so long as the banks pass it on!