QUOTE(kingofnowhere @ Apr 19 2006, 01:47 AM) [snapback]352600[/snapback]
Hi Webmaster
Sorry to be a pain but this is incorrect
Mortgage Equity Withdrawal
Spend, spend, spend. New kitchens, new cars, exotic holidays...the list goes on. The British homeowner released vast amounts of equity from their homes and went on a spending spree
Spending on New Kitchens isn't MEW as the money is invested in the housing stock.
KON, I know this is one of your bugbears and I am not denying the strict correctness of your argument as to what is or is not "officially measured" MEW (detailed ad nauseam in other threads -) but if someone theoretically installed a new kitchen every year in their house and, in a period of low interest rates and increasing house prices (eg 2000-2006), used remortgaging as the tool to fund the cost, surely there is a limit to how much of that cost (+ borrowing) is really reflected in the investment in housing stock? This would not count as official MEW? But to all intents and purposes the borrowing has not been invested in the housing stock, only a small portion of it (reflecting what a buyer would pay for the house - he would not recognise the "value" of 4 previous kitchens over the last 4 years).
And it is not wholly theoretical. I know someone who is on their second kitchen in 4 years. Another example is the purchase of a property and immediate replacement of kitchen by new owners, followed by the same again a couple of years later by another purchaser. The cost of these kitchens is funded usually through mortgage tack-ons or refis but at some point it ceases to add value to the housing stock and is closer to the generally received version of MEW being withdrawal of cash to fund lifestyle.
Alternatively, if I bought my kitchen on finance from Magnet and then, a year or two later, repaid that finance deal by increasing my mortgage and using the funds to do so ("consolidation of debts") - is that MEW or not? It would not be recognised as such would it (officially) - but the real effect is the same. I think what I am saying is that official MEW can be misleading(ly low) as there is not a commensurate increase in value of the housing stock for the "investment" represented by the "MEW".
Finally, when friends of mine remortgaged (using new valuation to gear up), part was used to replace their kitchen, part to consolidate debts and to buy a car. All was declared as "home improvements" to the B.Soc. All they needed to show was quotes (not invoices) for the work (eg kithen, bathroom, conservatory etc) - but didn't go ahead with most of it, just the kitchen. All this does not count as official MEW?
I understand the official MEW line (I think) but still I believe it does not tell the whole story.
Just curious.