QUOTE(Charlie The Tramp @ Dec 29 2005, 12:40 PM) [snapback]261880[/snapback]
Let me remind you of the above post.
Maybe a humble apology to Webmaster and the Moderators for posting a so called trollish thread may be in order if as you say you are a genuine poster, so far that has not been forthcoming.
Your posting in the Main Forum is subject to Moderator approval which means they remain invisible until a Moderator checks them before putting them up.
Even in the "house prices to rocket" thread after I switched back to normal mode, I think that any reasonable reader would see that I was then genuine. After reading your post I did see if any of my latter posts had made it through moderation, and some had. It was informative to see that only posts either quoting evidence supporting a bearish position (e.g. if FTBs dropped to 8% last year, was that 8% of a 30 year low in sales, meaning that the drop in FTBs had been even more severe than it first appeared?), or not arguing for or against HPC (renting) had got through.
However, most importantly, I don't feel that I have anything to apologise for. Satire is a valid method of bringing points up for argument, and that is what I did. And this was fully explained after a short period. Neither do I really feel a huge motivation to grovel before the assorted bigwigs of HPC so that I may be granted the precious priviledge of being able to post in the main forums. You may write me off as some arrogant newbie but personally I think that the HPC forum would benefit more from having me as a regular poster than I would gain through posting. (not serious: so whom should grovel before whom).
I think that this forum may have started well, but the prevailing culture here is no longer conducive to intelligent debate. The prevailing culture appears to be a semi-religious one. I even saw people saying that they had been "saved" by HPC. And like many religions, a house price crash here is now treated more like dogma than theory. The attribution of any conflicting evidence to VI spin, or the construction of increasingly contorted arguments as to why even evidence seemingly supporting either a soft landing or prices being maintained in the short term does support a HPC next week. The increasing reliance on anecdotal evidence (exaggerated: "the land registry figures may be XXX but a newsagent three miles from me has three houses for sale in the window while all of last year it only had one) reminds me of the kind of evidence-dodging arguments used to support dodgy alternative medicine and the like.
It's not that I disagree with the likelihood of a house price crash, but like many things there is conflicting evidence that must be sorted through and weighed, and a great deal of uncertainty concerning exactly what will happen, when, and how. Going too far in arguing a case is counter-productive, and that is what I believe is happening here.
BillyShears